-06 contains only this change (1510 to 4120, in 3 places) > Looks good. Note that your reference to RFC1510 is stale; it should be to > RFC4120. I'm not sure why I didn't catch this before. If you use this link > instead:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-06 -- Derrick _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
