On 10/19/10 1:40 PM, "Jeff Hutzelman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> And yes, since this is the first time around, it is my personal preference > to wait and make sure everything is in order, even if it takes a bit > longer. The entire basis for this process is the apparent consensus on > Simon's document; it seems best to deviate as little as possible with > regard to bootstrapping. If there were fewer requests and documents pending, I would tend to agree with you. As the entire standardization process has been at a standstill for an extended period (both in terms of processing documents, and getting the vote "approved") and there is a large backlog of things that need to be done, I think it's time to get on with it. The point of my note was to poll for consensus that we're all happy with the result and we can go forward without further ado. > Fortunately, "we" don't really have the choice, in that it's not up to you > or I. See above call for consensus. _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
