--On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 11:36:35 PM -0500 Andrew Deason
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:03:06 -0400
Jason Edgecombe <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm fine with waiting on the voting to be resolved. To make things
smoother in the coming years, would it be wise to change the voting
procedure to only require two of the three vote takers to decide the
outcome?
Assuming I'm remembering the charter doc correctly, the vote takers in
future elections are the existing chairs (unless one of them is running
for election). The process is different this time because we don't have
any existing chairs yet.
So in the future, we'll most likely only have one or two vote-takers.
Yes; that's my understanding as well. This actually makes me a little
nervous; vote-taking is one of the few things that has to be done at least
partially in secret, which means it's very hard to verify if there's only
one vote-taker. I'd prefer to see two or three vote-takers in every
election, in which case I'd support Jason's suggestion.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
