On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> wrote: ... > To be clear... > > In my message, "Call for Votes", sent on August 24, and speaking for the > registrars/vote-takers as a group, I wrote the following: > > >> Because the elections process has never been used or tested before, there >> are inevitably some gaps which need to be filled. Additionally, we feel >> the circumstances of bootstrapping call for special handling which is not >> fully spelled out in the provisional charter. Therefore, the vote-takers >> have taken several decisions regarding the process for the present >> election _only_. It is our hope that once the election is concluded and >> chairs are installed, the group will take what we have learned (and what >> we will learn) into consideration when formulating its initial charter. >> The decisions we've taken are as follows: > > ... > >> - In any situation which draft-wilkinson-afs3-standardisation-00 does >> not anticipate or address, the vote-takers will apply common sense >> to determine an appropriate course of action. > > > > This is such a provision, and we're invoking that bullet point now. > > In response to the community, Doug has issued a consensus call on whether to > accept the election results posted by Thomas and myself without waiting for > David's confirmation. Note that even if the election results are _not_ > accepted, under the lack-of-rules we have so far, Doug has as much authority > to do this as anyone else. >
I also agree that the vote counts of the two vote-takers be accepted. Thank you, Steven _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
