On 12/6/2010 4:41 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> --On Monday, December 06, 2010 02:45:57 PM -0600 "Douglas E. Engert"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Section 2.3.3 also states it needs to be confirmed that the RFC editors
>> are happy with this process, and submitting this document as
>> an individual document to the RFC editors would confirm that they are
>> happy.
> 
> I believe Jeff Altman had a conversation with RFC-Editor folks before we
> started down this path.  Perhaps he'd like to confirm that?

There have been major changes to the RFC-Editor functions for the
independent submissions track since our standardization process began.
I am not aware that anyone has spoken with the new editor regarding
AFS3 standards documents.

Once we were at the point of obtaining chairs, I felt it would be
best for the new chairs to hold those discussions.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization

Reply via email to