On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:03:20 -0500 Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I haven't read the document in question, so I can't comment on whether > creating a registry in this particular case is appropriate. But > certainly, don't reject it out of hand just because we don't have any > other such. Sure. This wasn't clear from my note, but the document currently does create a registry for the field in question. So, I'm certainly not rejecting it. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
