--On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 04:18:23 PM -0600 David Boyes
<[email protected]> wrote:
12: what you're describing in this document is your proposed
implementation, not the actual code, right? If so, then the text of line
12 should reflect that it is a proposal, not a description of an
implementation.
Um, no. This is not a finished document that describes a proposal; it is a
draft of a document that, when complete and assuming it is accepted, will
be a standard. The abstract is not an abstract of the draft document and
its present state; it is a draft of the abstract of the final document.
What it says now -- "this document describes an ... RPC..." -- is entirely
appropriate. Nowhere does it claim to describe an implementation, or even
a proposed implementation. It describes a protocol.
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
