On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Simon Wilkinson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 8 Feb 2011, at 15:20, Derrick Brashear wrote:
>
>> struct {
>>  int addrtype;
>>  int addrlen;
>>  int addr<>
>> } rx_addr;
>>
>> #define RX_ADDRTYPE_IPV4 1
>> #define RX_ADDRTYPE_IPV6 2
>
> Why not just use an opaque? That way you don't get into any of the ordering
> issues that ints bring with them.
>
> struct {
>   int addrtype;
>   opaque addr<>;
> } rx_addr;

That's fine too.

So what else belongs in this draft? Do we need to specify how an
unknown addrtype will be handled?


-- 
Derrick
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization

Reply via email to