--On Wednesday, February 09, 2011 11:27:29 PM -0600 Andrew Deason
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:36:53 -0500
Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote:
> I support having port numbers so that hosting multiple cells on the
> same host may be possible. How would port numbers be handled, if not
> alongside the address?
as another element in an RPC payload?
But if someone has an endpoint with a different 'port' width, or some
entirely different equivalent of a 'port', we have to rev the whole
protocol?
No; we probably need to do something for the transport layer along the same
lines as what we're talking about for the session layer. But let's not
conflate them.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
