On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 07:42:31 -0500 Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think it should be submitted again with status "Informational" as > > "experimental" rather than as "draft". > > which means .... > Intended status: Informational > ? > > because right now nothing is listed as Draft... I read it like this: It should be submitted with IETF I-D status "Informational", as it is in the AFS-3 status "experimental", and is no longer in the AFS-3 status "draft". That is, it's no longer "draft", but it is "experimental", and "experimental" standards should have IETF "intended status" marked as "Informational". So yeah, Intended Status: Informational. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
