On 7 Mar 2011, at 20:46, Tom Keiser wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've published a new I-D, based upon the on-list consensus from the other
> week, defining a new discriminated union primitive type. Feedback and
> comments are hereby invited...
I'm puzzled as to why length isn't just the length of the arm. If you modify
the encoding so that length is just the length of the encoded arm, then you can
actually decode these "new" unions using an existing rpcgen, by encoding them as
struct {
int type;
opaque arm;
}
... which I suspect might come in useful somewhere down the line.
Cheers,
Simon.
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
