On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:17:52 +0000 Simon Wilkinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 4/ Rewrite the challenge definition in terms of either the proposed > new afs-union structure (which seems to me to break abstraction > layers) This is what I thought would be done in cases like this. What abstraction is this breaking? The new type is at the XDR layer, like all of the other XDR primitives. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
