I had thought of safe-union and guarded-union, I wasn't in love with these.
Matt ----- "Andrew Deason" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:28:52 -0400 > Tom Keiser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Additionally, IMHO, this is merely a coupling at the namespace > level: > > nothing precludes us from adding rx-union XDR routines to any > > arbitrary RPC framework. > > Yes, just call it something else. I can come up with a bunch of > suggestions (and I think there have been several on list), but it > helps > to have one, so: inline-union? A la BulkStatus vs InlineBulkStatus... > > -- > Andrew Deason > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > AFS3-standardization mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
