On 6 May 2011, at 23:29, Andrew Deason wrote: > > I think I heard someone may have wanted something for 'absolute' in the > first type name... would AFSAbsTime, AFSRelTime, and AFSTimeRes be okay?
I think if you're making AFSTime AFSAbsTime, then AFSTimeRes should be AFSAbsTimeRes, just to preserve symmetry. > Also, should I put the "this is not an IETF standard" paragraph > somewhere in the front matter? Does it go in an existing section, or > should I make a new one? That is, this paragraph from the ISE > discussions: My temptation would be to see what happens with the progression of our "test" document through the ISE queue, before we make changes to other documents. That said, there's no harm in adding that text now - just that the positioning, and even the language, may end up being changed before this document reaches them. Cheers, Simon. _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
