On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 09:15 -0500, David Boyes wrote: > > 6 months later...
So, _I_ was replying to a 6-month-old message. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make with this quote, or with the subject. Perhaps you'd like to clarify? > Now that the handover apparently is complete What gave you that idea? AFAIK I don't take office until October 1. > could the new chairs > comment on the estimated publication schedule for the documents in > queue? No. Well, I can't speak for Hartmut. I can't comment on anything, because I'm not up to speed yet. When I am, I still don't think I'll be able to tell you much. There is no hard schedule for getting documents done; that depends on how much time people have to contribute to discussions and edit and review documents. A document is done when it's done, and we have consensus on it, not when some arbitrary deadline passes. Unfortunately, even after a document is approved, I can provide only limited insight into how long it takes for it to be published. IETF working group documents seem to take a couple of months from approval to publication, provided the document is of reasonable size and there are no significant delays in AUTH48 or due to dependencies on other documents. However, IIRC the RFC Publication Center assigns higher priority (and thus more cycles) to IETF stream documents than to the Independent stream. So, the publication delay for our documents may be longer. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
