On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 21:47, Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: > Forwarding this along to reach more of the AFS community. I wrote back > and said that I agreed with the closing of the registry and would be very > surprised if anyone objected or anticipated further AFSDB record type > registrations, but that I'd pass along any objections.
One should never say never, but the probability of a new registration would seem to be close enough to zero to be declared zero. SRV records are the agreed upon future (even though AFSDB records will exist in bind (and its competitors) forever). Gary _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
