On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 10:21 -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote: > Actually, and people can feel free to tell me i'm wrong, the thing > that would make this easy to review in > terms of diff would be gerrit, because it uses coloring to show you > only what the changes are, not even > whole lines but as little as a single character.
a new I-D, or even two (one with Simon's changes so far and another with changes since then). For drafts that are actually in the I-D repository, tools.ietf.org provides a number of useful tools to assist in review, including two kinds of word-diff. I think deploying a gerrit instance to facilitate "group" document editing is overkill. Part of the job of a document editor is to turn discussion into changes to the document, and periodically prepare new revisions. While some group wordsmithing is occasionally necessary, that can easily be done via the mailing list, and having the group do word-by-word textual review of every edit is usually counterproductive (in a fairly literal sense -- it reduces everyone's productivity). Just my (personal) $0.02. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
