On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:11:39 -0500 Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote:
> When referring to internet drafts from other (XML source) I-Ds, > xml.resource.org provides a handy service of pregenerated bibliography XML > entries for the draft (e.g., > http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names.xml). > > When a document moves from an I-D to an RFC, a new URL for the document's > bibxml is provided on xml.resource.org, reflecting its status as a > published RFC. While a document is still an I-D, references to it from > other I-Ds include the phrase "(work in progress)" in the references > section. > > The AFS-3 standardization community is using I-Ds for its working > documents, but we currently publish finalized documents on > http://afs3-stds.central.org. At present, these documents are still > formatted as internet drafts (perhaps they should be reformatted?). > However, the easiest way to get bibxml entries for them remains the > xml.resource.org site, which includes the "work in progress" statement, > which is no longer true. Should we host our own bibxml for finished > documents? It would seem to make a few things cleaner, but does require > some effort to generate and host the entries. Creating a bibxml3 directory on afs3-std.central.org for completed documents seems reasonable to me, and sounds like something the co-chairs can do as part of promoting the document. Jeffrey Huztelman, do you have an opinion? -- Michael Meffie <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
