> I'm still not sure whether maxcalls is supposed to be RX_MAXCALLS (4) or 
> max(call_numbers).

It is an indication of the number of call channels supported by the current RX 
stack. So, currently it would always be RX_MAXCALLS. However, there is a long 
standing plan to raise the number of calls that one rx connection can support, 
and that's much easier if rxgk already has the ability to do so.

However, that same information is available from call_numbers.len, providing 
you require that call numbers be provided for all call channels, not just those 
which have been active in the life of the connection, so we should probably 
just remove maxcalls from the authenticator.

Cheers,

Simon._______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization

Reply via email to