Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>> Extended callbacks cannot be fully implemented until there are >> protected callback channels. That does not mean there are not benefits >> to protecting the callback channels in a world without extended >> callbacks. > I believe the question at hand is whether those benefits are sufficient > to delay standardizing rxgk. Do you have an opinion on this question? Personally, I think an rxgk standard that didn't protect the callback channel would be absurd. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
