On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 15:10:10 -0400
Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote:

> I read this draft, and have no objection to the technical protocol 
> described therein.
> 
> However, the document itself has a couple of omissions/errors.

Ben, Thank you for the review and the comments.

<snip>

As a reminder, the announced review period ends on April 11th for
the documents.

    Base Types for Time in AFS-3
    draft-deason-afs3-type-time-03
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deason-afs3-type-time

    Extensible XDR Discriminated Union Primitive Type
    draft-keiser-afs3-xdr-union-04
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-keiser-afs3-xdr-union

    Adding a Flexible GetSize RPC Variant to the AFS-3 Volume Service
    draft-deason-afs3-getsizev2-03
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deason-afs3-getsizev2
 

Thanks,
Mike

-- 
Michael Meffie <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization

Reply via email to