On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 13:56 -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
It also struck me in parts of Section 8 that we sometimes request things
of the registry and at other times suggest actions for them. I don't know
how important the distinction is; we could probably just request things
always.
To me, that section reads as a request that two new registries be
created, with a suggestion as to how to divide up the namespace. I'm
Yes.
not really concerned about how it's worded. Is the namespace actually
I'm not concerned, either. It just stuck out at me a little while I was
reading, so I thought I'd mention it.
only 32 bits? If so, then reserving 1/4 of them for private use seems a
bit large. Unless we think there are likely to be a lot of site-defined
(not vendor-specific) flags.
Yes, the RPC argument is a 32-bit flags field.
Only one flag value is currently defined; I'm not really worried that we
will run out.
-Ben
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
