What are the exact reasons for splitting up the framework into independent parts? I've seen some lines here and there about it on the forums and in the wiki, too. I don't really get the point of it - if we have independent thingies, it's not a framework anymore but rather a plain, stupid toolbox of utilities.
- David > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of zimba-tm > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 3:26 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [agavi-dev] Splitting up the framwork > > Would you mind if we split the framework into different parts ? > The main goal is to avoid too much coupling between the different > parts. So that different tries can be tested. > > To start with, I was thinking about : > - Logging > - ErrorHandler > - ClassLoader > - MVC > - Configuration > and the Skeleton application > > I was also thinking to use the Pear packages > > more to come... > > If you have any sugestions about how to manage dependencies and > version numbers, I'd be happy :) > > -- > Cheers, > zimba > > http://zimba.oree.ch > _______________________________________________ > agavi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://labworkz.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agavi-dev _______________________________________________ agavi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://labworkz.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agavi-dev
