The current names don't bother me... Appenders append, Loggers log.. the only one I can never remember is Layouts, but I don't know that equates to a bad name ;) --Bob
On 7/6/05, David Zülke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Logger names are definitely better that way. LoggerManager is fine, too. I > still don't like the concept of LoggerGroups that much since I think it's > overhead, who in the world needs LoggerGroups if everything is Observer > style. But LoggerGroup (without the "s") is okay if we want to have it. > > - David > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Mike Vincent > > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 2:46 PM > > To: Bob Zoller; Agavi Development > > Subject: Re: [agavi-dev] Logging opinions needed > > > > How opposed would you (guys?) be to changing the names from Loggers to > > LoggerGroups and Appenders to Loggers ? > > > > * LoggerManager > > ** LoggerGroups > > *** FileLogger > > *** MailLogger > > *** StderrLogger > > *** StdoutLogger > > > > Does the current naming only bug me? *shrug* :) > > > > -Mike > > (this is the time to change it if we do) > > _______________________________________________ > > agavi-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://labworkz.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agavi-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > agavi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://labworkz.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agavi-dev > _______________________________________________ agavi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://labworkz.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agavi-dev
