I created an 0.10 version branch and tagged version 0.10.0.
Here's teh plan:
- commit it to branches/0.10
- don't forget to merge the bugfix back to trunk ;)
- after you're done and finished packaging etc, tag the new version
by copying branches/0.10 HEAD to tags/0.10.1 (which is just one
command: svn copy svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/svn/agavi/
branches/0.10 svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/svn/agavi/tags/
0.10.1 -m "Tagging version 0.10.1"
- David
P.S.: I fixed the package tasks so they finally and hopefully will
include INSTALL and RELEASE_NOTES. I've also added Veikko and me to
the maintainers list and labeled us all "developers", at least until
someone comes up with something better ;)
P.P.S.: We maybe should have "vanilla" tarballs for 0.11 or
something, since not everyone will want to go the PEAR way.
P.P.P.S.: You guessed right, all new features still go into trunk
(and feature branches before that), the 0.10 branch remains for
bugfixes etc which, of course, should be ported back to trunk and
vice-versa. We're already at 0.10.1 right now, and maybe we'll have
to roll some more members of the 0.10 family, but let's not hope so ;)
P.P.P.P.S.: Veikko, we really need to get off our arses and write
some tests :D
Am 05.01.2006 um 16:48 schrieb Bob Zoller:
Sounds like something we need to get out there ASAP. I'll find some
free time today to get that change into trunk and roll 0.10.1, though
it may not be until later tonight unfortunately.
--Bob
On 1/5/06, Veikko Mäkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
As pointed out in http://forum.agavi.org/viewtopic.php?id=79 Agavi
0.10.0 has a bug in context.ini parsing. This is because the
ReturnArrayConfigHandler was changed to behave like it's suppose to
behave and context.ini parsing relied on the older version of
ReturnArrayConfigHandler.
We talked about this with David but fixing it has been delayed
because
of the holidays (oh yes, New Year's eve at Puerto de la Cruz,
Tenerife
was nice :). We both think that ReturnArrayConfigHandler now works as
it's supposed to work so introducing a separate ContextConfigHandler
class seemed like a good idea. So I did one (actually I just took an
older version of the ReturnArrayCH and renamed it, I'm lazy and
busy).
This is a quick and dirty fix for now, but something had to be
done. I
opened a new branch for this.
Do we like this? Is it adequate for now? When do we merge it to trunk
and (re-)release 0.10.0? Did Santa bring lot's of presents? Did we
deserve them?
-veikko
_______________________________________________
agavi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://labworkz.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agavi-dev
_______________________________________________
agavi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://labworkz.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agavi-dev
_______________________________________________
agavi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://labworkz.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agavi-dev
