all im saying is i know that digitally, with me watching,scientology WILL NOT 
act effectively to secureépatrol its own domain or anything of any real 
interest or importance to it. it especially WILL NOT CATCH OR KILL PREY IN 
FRONT OF ME SO ICANNOT BECONFUSED INTO THINKING THAT ANYTHING IT LETS ME SEE IT 
DOING, ANYWHERE, IS SOMETHING IT EVER DOES TO GET ANY ADVANTAGE SO I thus, 
cannot, after a fashion, be confused, ever, into thinking i should copy 
anything i see it doing! so, it puts me in a senseat a yet lesser functional 
impediment... than some people. good! for my purposes: not, necessarily, for 
its. this is it being prudent as pertains to me it is not it being 
experimental. it is it behaving conservatively, as a matter of choice, and of 
necessity, when it knows i can see what it wants it knows i will act to foil it 
so... it will not do anything that matters in front of me. so i will not ever 
think i should copy of Èbe like È it it is not acting to further any of its 
goals in my sight, as i understand it, ever in the future direction again. good!

https://pastebin.com/GSfePpRP
https://twitter.com/brilanon/status/1034555701417443328
https://pastebin.com/GSfePpRP
https://pastebin.com/324x5dcy
https://pastebin.com/a4mE47hp
https://pastebin.com/hvPSWN33
https://pastebin.com/APGmP3tS

nice conclusion. i actually, me, Like this new relationship: yeah, she is 
pretttyyy... ghoopod...
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tb430f38afcf905a1-M25c32a6bf7900eb312ad9a16
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to