Well... my AI system for one contains *rules* and *facts*. Facts are just English sentences.
Rules are basically natural language plus certain operators plus embedded code fragments. Rules can process as well as generate user input, bot output & facts. There are also meta rules and facts (those which talk about other rules and facts). Stanley Nilsen <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., 31. Aug. 2018 04:59: > A few thoughts... > > > If an intelligent device is to be planned and built according to a modular > architecture, it would be appropriate to determine what the “storage” of > the intelligence looks like. What will the device contain that makes it > intelligent? Are these “blocks” of intelligence measurable? Can this > intelligence be wired into the unit easily? > > > Part of the reason for looking at this essence of intelligence is to > better see what needs to surround the intelligence to have a complete > system. In my thinking (over the past few years,) I've come to favor a way > of looking at intelligence that can easily lead to a fairly complete > “generally” intelligent device. > > > *Intelligence Stuff* > > The stuff that goes into intelligence is knowledge, but knowledge alone > isn't enough. For knowledge to contribute to intelligence, it has to be in > a “package” consisting of several pieces of knowledge, and physical > accessories, which all relate to one another in a specific way. To refer > to this package, I call it “opportunity.” > > > People have a common understanding of opportunity, and it fits nicely > into the conversation about intelligence. Consider that an opportunity is > related to a benefit, and one's situation. This implies that we can > “choose” an opportunity when it is likely to bring benefit. The idea being > that we make a good “choice” given the situation – doing the intelligent > thing. > > > You may object to giving opportunity a “high status” because awareness of > an opportunity doesn't give us that opportunity. And I would be the first > to agree. But, I would say that one only has real opportunity when he can > execute a recipe that will bring benefit. In other words, you only have > opportunity if you have the whole package, and the opportunity package (the > unit of intelligence) includes being able to take action that causes > changes (benefits) in the real world. This taking action is what makes > intelligence much more than intellectual exercise. > > > In the view from 50,000 feet, the mature intelligent device has hundreds > of opportunity to choose from in a given moment. It's overall “score” on > the intelligence scale is determined by both it's quantity of opportunity > and the quality of each opportunity. Cloning intelligence would mean > giving the less mature unit opportunities that it can add to it's store of > opportunity. > > > There is much more that can be said about architecture centered around > opportunity. I would be happy to engage in a discussion if anyone is > interested. > > > Stan > > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tfe5cebb05ec5fbb6-M6faf325155acf0a4185a88b6> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tfe5cebb05ec5fbb6-Me875a98a103363203b8ac88f Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
