Sorry. That was an addendum. On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 11:21 AM Linas Vepstas <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... > >> Meanwhile linguistics is still split, structuralism is still destroyed. >> No-one knows why distributed representation works better, and equally >> no-one knows why we can't "learn" adequate representations. >> > > Well, I tried to explain exactly why in the PDF that I posted. That was > kind-of the whole point of the PDF. I don't know why you say "nobody", > because what I'm saying may be technical, but its not that technical, and > it should not be that hard to follow. > > >> >> So we flounder around, struggling with stuff which either "works" better >> or doesn't "work" better, for what reason, nobody knows quite why. >> > > I think I know and I think I explained and here I get frustrated because > I've been saying this for over five years now, and despite writing hundreds > of pages on the topic, its a thud, with no echo. Is anyone out there? Can > anyone hear me? > I must have missed it. I got excited when I saw category theory, which hinted at my solution. I must have missed your solution completely. Can you summarize it in a line? -R ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T581199cf280badd7-Mb2040b7000c9846d3a00df66 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
