Keith Henson recently drew my attention to
this 210 page report by Eric Drexler:

 * https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/reframing/

Title is: "Reframing Superintelligence:
Comprehensive AI Services as General Intelligence"

Drexler argues against the "AGI" terminology,
promoting his own "Comprehensive AI Services"
(CAIS) terminology in its place. This is
part of the "Reframing" in the title and
there's a lot more of it in the paper. Drexler
objects to the "agentification" intelligent
systems - among other things.

I'm sometimes a bit exasperated too by some
of the terminology in the field - but Drexler's
report comes across as a bit of a mixture of
sour grapes and "not invented here" syndrome
to me. Anyone else care to dive in and see if
they can find things worthwhile? Drexler is
smart and has an interesting track record.

Drexler says he was funded by the Berkeley
Existential Risk Initiative (BERI), the
European Research Council, the Alexander Tamas
Programme on AI Safety, and supported by the
Future of Humanity Institute. These are mostly folk
who like to warn everyone about the coming
apocalypse at the hands of intelligent machines.
Drexler seems like an odd pairing with them.
He has some history with this sort of thing -
where some people feared that self-reproducing
"grey goo" would eat the biosphere. Anyway,
this seems like a PR win for them: they can
now cite Drexler as celebrity who is taking
them seriously.

--
__________
 |im |yler http://timtyler.org/


------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T068283ee543da084-M97715a0f5f54ab968652f4ca
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to