Why is compression "the hard problem of intelligence"? We have compression. I'd say the hard problem of intelligence is making an AI that builds a boat and sails in it. We do not have that yet.
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 at 06:37, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > Chuck chose my question the first to answer on Slashdot circa 2001 > <https://developers.slashdot.org/story/01/09/11/139249/chuck-moore-holds-forth>. > As it pertains to the relationship between programming and compression -- > specifically programming _as_ compression -- and as compression is The Hard > Problem of Intelligence, you my want to take a gander and consider whether > you are barking up the right tree with your approach. So far as I can > tell, involves inference based on something other than an optimally > compressed set of facts -- which means it's ill-founded. Don't feel alone, > however. The vast majority of machine learning folks are wandering without > that compass in the same general desert -- although they are armed with a > bag of tricks that may have been discovered by those possessing said > compass. > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 6:38 PM A.T. Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > >> MindForth resets associative tags before each operation of Indicative >> module. >> >> In the MindForth artificial intelligence (AI) for robots, we will now >> start to display an apparatus of diagnostic messages at the start of the >> Indicative module to tell us the values being held in variables which serve >> the purpose of creating associative tags to interconnect the concepts being >> expressed as English words during the operation of the Indicative >> mind-module. Since the ConJoin module will often insert a conjunction >> between two thoughts being generated, the AI Mind Maintainer needs >> assurance that variable-values operative during one thought do not >> erroneously get carried over past a conjunction into the separate process >> of generating another thought. >> >> Just by resetting the tsj time-of-subject variable to zero at the start >> of the Indicative module, we have made the Forthmind able to trigger >> repeated instances of logical InFerence. Each running of the Indicative >> module amounts to a fresh declaration of the associative tags in the >> conceptual flag-panel that supports the generation of ideas in the >> MindGrid. The following dialog still has a few problems, but it shows the >> repeated triggering of an inference. >> >> john is a student >> >> DOES JOHN READ BOOKS >> no >> >> Indicative: tsj= 0 tvb= 0 tdo= 0 >> A JOHN DOES NOT READ BOOKS >> >> Indicative: tsj= 0 tvb= 0 tdo= 0 >> PROFESSORS TEACH THE STUDENTS AND >> Indicative: tsj= 0 tvb= 0 tdo= 0 >> STUDENTS READ THE BOOKS >> >> Indicative: tsj= 0 tvb= 0 tdo= 0 >> I UNDERSTAND YOU AND >> Indicative: tsj= 0 tvb= 0 tdo= 0 >> YOU ARE A MAGIC >> andru is student >> >> DOES ANDRU READ THE BOOKS >> no >> >> Indicative: tsj= 0 tvb= 0 tdo= 0 >> AN ANDRU DOES NOT READ THE BOOKS AND >> Indicative: tsj= 0 tvb= 0 tdo= 0 >> YOU READ THE BOOKS >> >> Indicative: tsj= 0 tvb= 0 tdo= 0 >> PROFESSORS TEACH THE STUDENTS AND >> Indicative: tsj= 0 tvb= 0 tdo= 0 >> STUDENTS READ THE BOOKS >> >> Indicative: tsj= 0 tvb= 0 tdo= 0 >> STUDENTS READ THE BOOKS AND >> Indicative: tsj= 0 tvb= 0 tdo= 0 >> I THINK >> >> http://ai.neocities.org/mindforth.txt >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.lang.forth/7gUrhuaL9gc/j0zMg_3CBQAJ >> >> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2d0576044f01b0b1-M5b444b20f9b0aff4f70a9ad4> > -- Stefan Reich BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2d0576044f01b0b1-Mf68b88381dafd59714cedc9e Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
