Sadly, repl.it doesn't provide a creation date, otherwise I could tell you the exact day that I originally "sent" the first email in this thread.
It's probably 3-5 weeks ago. On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:04 AM Manuel Korfmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, also big disclaimer: The initial email was sent on 16 october, but I > originally "sent" it a big while ago, just my mac email program wasn't > authenticated with google until 16. october. > > That probably explains why I'm so lost in my own code. > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:03 AM Manuel Korfmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ok, sorry for being overly sensitive. Did you see my last email before >> this one? I described it's functionality in the most simplest words I could >> find atm. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:01 AM Stefan Reich via AGI < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> After all, you did post it >>> >>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 23:58, Stefan Reich < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> There was no attack in what I posted whatsoever. I just wanted to know >>>> how your AI experiment works >>>> >>>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 23:52, Manuel Korfmann <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Please be more specific in your questioning or less "ironic" when I >>>>> don't correctly guess what you were questioning about. >>>>> >>>>> I assumed you were asking about the functionality of the versioning >>>>> idea i proposed. >>>>> >>>>> The question producing ai doesn't work yet. >>>>> >>>>> I don't want to outlay the specifics to be laughed at by you or other >>>>> readers before I stated: This was a one night experiment, not much thought >>>>> was put into it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:19 PM Stefan Reich via AGI < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Uh... what? I thought it's a question producing AI >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 22:47, Manuel Korfmann <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It would be a library to be included in the server-side code as well >>>>>>> as the client-side code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The library would plug into the error reporting/exception system of >>>>>>> the technology used on the server-side or client-side. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In my case, that would by Rails (Ruby) and JavaScript (Chrome). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then it would make a git diff when it reports a render or user >>>>>>> action that happened without errors being thrown. When there is a diff >>>>>>> (changes), it will make a git commit and tag it with (no_errors_server >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> no_errors_client). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The user can customize it to also save tagged commits when there is >>>>>>> no error only on the server or client. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Stefan Reich >>>>>> BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Stefan Reich >>>> BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Stefan Reich >>> BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems >>> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* >>> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + >>> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery >>> options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink >>> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tbf030efda3f5cc86-M9d57a90d4cf1bdfdb582629d> >>> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tbf030efda3f5cc86-Mc0a9a2f254c85dbc4da478f7 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
