To add to my comment above. We need: 1) More active members. 2) Who are very knowledgeable about AGI. 3) Who are doing empirical science and not just talk. 4) Who are serious. We DO have some members here, and they even code, and know some stuff about AGI, but I want to see more seriousness in their posts as I don't see it much. I see a lot of long and silly paragraphs, from many people. The focus on the right things and the team communication (and clarity of teachings) needs to improve. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T252d8aea50d6d8f9-M5515571cdd780548875e1968 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data rouncer81
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data John Rose
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data rouncer81
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data John Rose
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data rouncer81
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data rouncer81
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data rouncer81
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data Matt Mahoney
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data James Bowery
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data rouncer81
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data John Rose
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data Matt Mahoney
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data John Rose
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data rouncer81
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data John Rose
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data John Rose
- Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data John Rose
