On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 1:18 PM Pei Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Matt, > > You haven't followed us closely. ;-) > Obviously not. Thank you for restoring my faith in AGI. > We are doing vision (Perception from an AGI Perspective > <http://www.cis.temple.edu/~pwang/Publication/perception.pdf>), language > (Natural > Language Processing by Reasoning and Learning > <https://github.com/PhillyAGITeam/Website/blob/master/Papers/PAGI-TR-1.pdf>), > knowledge base (ConceptNet and WordNet connections), and robotics. For > application, see A > <https://cis.temple.edu/tagit/events/papers/Hammer.pdf>reasoning > based <https://cis.temple.edu/tagit/events/papers/Hammer.pdf> model for > anomaly detection in the Smart City domain > <https://cis.temple.edu/tagit/events/papers/Hammer.pdf> and Beyond ML/DL: > Learning by Reasoning for Smarter Cities and Safer Schools. > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7EtRJatVmg> > I wasn't able to open the first 3 PDF files but the video was very interesting. Especially setting up a billion surveillance cameras to detect jaywalking. :-/ What roles do OpenCog and OpenNars play in this vision system? > Of course there are still many problems to be resolved, though I don't > think low-level cognition is harder than high-level cognition, nor that the > latter "never was the real problem". > > Regards, > > Pei > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:17 AM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 1:19 PM Eugene Surowitz via AGI < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You might take a look at Pei Wang's NARS system; >>> an 'Open NARS' system is available. >>> >> >> Pei Wang was on this list when it was first founded but left years ago. >> NARS (non axiomatic reasoning system) again has the same hardware >> limitations of other probabilistic reasoning systems. It lacks vision, >> language, speech, and robotics. It also never had a knowledge base or any >> useful applications. >> >> Again, not trying to be critical because it's a really hard problem. >> Modeling high level cognitive processing never was the real problem. It's >> the petaflops of low level processing tuned by millions of years of >> evolution. >> >>> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7116d9f5c1f0551d-M663b13943d6d0d249cd955fb> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7116d9f5c1f0551d-M67cd9056c648c0ce9419037b Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
