Thanks everyone for the opinions.

So, I see a lot of disagreement. But let me try to accurate about what this
disagreement is about. It seems like nobody is challenging the idea that
no-free-lunch theorem contradicts the notion of general intelligence (and
vice versa). Instead, everyone seems to challenge the validity of the
no-free-lunch theorem. Would that be a correct conclusion so far?

Colloquially, we could say that people here are expecting "free lunches"
while working on general intelligence. Would that be correct?

If this is true, than this is not what I expected. Interesting. This gives
me something to mull over.

Danko

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:57 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> Matt I think the particles of Earth with the in delay particles around
> Earth are in effect a closed box system at least in some sense. I.e.
> particles in another galaxy aren't affecting us, only the light that has
> traveled here from it. So technically Earth is 'uniform'...simply what
> happens is Physics, and as I said it's commonsense that short, fast,
> patterny solutions/strings are favored and overpopulate the rest. Physics
> works that way, certain solutions/agents win over the rest, and changes
> Earth etc to become more patterny and better at survival. And so it goes
> that some machines are 'Good' at a lot, more than other machines, because,
> well, think of it as particles just doing their thing and one takes over
> and updates the rest, so, this is what we flowing down the river I
> mentioned call Good, and so a machine that does just as Good as any other
> machine is not the case, some take over and change everything. The whole
> idea that all machines/solutions/predictions can predict/do as much or are
> as likely as each other is the wrong way to see it all as, look at it
> another way - the overtaking/evolution I mentioned. There is physics, so
> not all scenarios are as likely. And the evolution of a system in our
> physics is by the more patterny mutations that survive longer/more likely,
> because of patterns beng leveraged.
> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery
> options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T353f2000d499d93b-Mdd1d492bf1f69da2bdab48db>
>


-- 
Prof. Dr. Danko Nikolić
www.danko-nikolic.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/danko-nikolic/

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T353f2000d499d93b-M65340d9c5d117616046b8730
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to