It may also help to read what he said about Evans's work. He dissed it in a way indicating he didn't see the potential of Evans's work in the 2017 paper sufficient to motivate him to watch Evans's progress. That tells me he's not the kind of intellect that has any business projecting the next decade in AI. He just doesn't have a knack for spotting key work.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:13 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > Search the AGI group for keyword "evans" and you'll see how you > misinterpreted what I meant when I said "out of date on Evans's work". > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 12:31 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ah, you meant Evan's technique is worse, not better. Well, how do you >> know it's obsolete? Where/what is the better technique then =) ? >> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* >> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + >> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery >> options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink >> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T61fdd08abb588577-M8b0bf45ab1786e72f418e583> >> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T61fdd08abb588577-Me984c7db309f27292eac961c Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
