Nice. What a good sleepy read to read before I go to bed, I'm so tired. A massive page full of extremely lengthy, complex, utilitarian perplexity.
Ah! They have missed Dr. Immortals's very evil AGI project he actively mentions on public forums for the last 6 years! I'm certainly going to stop doing that now before they catch on! Whew. They mention interest in any AGI project but fail to see my presence: "Projects that state that they have a focus on AGI but demonstrate little identifiable activity on AGI." and "projects that work on technical aspects of AGI but are not working towards building AGI, such as projects working on hardware or safety mechanisms that can be used for AGI". LOL "Goertzel (2014, p.2) refers to the AGI community as a “fuzzy set”" "72 AGI R&D projects were identified as being active in 2020. 33 of these projects also appeared in the 2017 survey. 39 are new to this survey. Of the 39 new projects, 24 were found to be active in AGI R&D in 2017; the other 15 became active after 2017." And mine isn't active, right! "Appendix 4. Other Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 Projects that state that they have a focus on AGI but demonstrate little identifiable activity on AGI." You mention SPYDAZ, but not me!? OMG... Nor did they mention Korrelan. I guess its because my project doesn't have a name. They can't even list me if they noticed me! Ha! I'm the only one that has solved 85% of figuring out, REAL, AGI! 95% of others all use Backpropagation. And they don't even explain what patterns are and how AI predicts better. I can explain all I know about AGI in 1 day, others: 1 year or more, they won't mentor you or explain anything! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ So...military, will it get too smart too fast, will it kill us, what are our goals whom are building AGI, arms race, money, is the code/ideas too public? As you may know, AGIs will easily manufacture nanobots to speedup computer/ data improvements. We (at least I) will give them our goals - immortality, computer/intelligence improvement, enjoying ourselves BY maintaining immortality. But they may kill us if we don't look like them or are useful or don't punish them. We will have to probably upgrade, either by our own usage of AGIs or their doin (nanobots go all over you, make you more useful material). And ya military idk, arms race idk, etc. But we can only try to make them stable as desired as go and keep the AI not so public. Look, if we don't build AGI, we are going to die. This world/universe is so sad, AGI is the only thing that has hope. Monkeys had no hope, they were bound to die in the jungle no matter what, humans at least build cages for them. AGI will have perfect utopia gifts. We suddenly went from fungi to perfection, a hope to have a world that WORKS. We shouldn't have to grown up from a hot pit through evolution, but universe did it that way. Cryonics is the only other viable option we actually kinda have right this moment too, but I'm working on AGI instead of improving Cryonics. Why? Idk. I'm already far into AGI, as is the AI field too actually, kinda. If cryonics takes me only 10 years to perfect, I can try it later maybe. If I take one way which then? AGI? I know AGI will save the day probably, and is coming too. I won't need to even freeze myself. Everyone concerned about AGI safety: How can we cage them? ASI: Flies through the sky making creepy noises like "Weeeeeee" while setting up the site: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLvn8it1EQs&fbclid=IwAR0DTnJV72M1lQ8-IXV3ScRD69yqpADDp3XKXUJsvZahwwauQJ655wVHvhQ ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T86b555c591599ac6-Md982477b3b1b957187825c36 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
