The proposition that my unproven speculation only needs some tweaking but your unproven speculation is completely wrong is a weak proposition that I have often seen in these AI discussion groups. Having seen it in others, I am wary of it popping up in my own thinking. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7c7052974ce450f1-M6432b74b2282464366bf6530 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention... John Rose
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in Salon edi... Mike Archbold
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in Salon... immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in Salon... Colin Hales
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in S... immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in S... WriterOfMinds
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention... Mike Archbold
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention... Mike Archbold
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in Salon editorial John Rose
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in Salon editorial James Bowery
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in Salon editori... Jim Bromer
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in Salon edi... immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in Salon... Dorian Aur
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in S... immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Colin Hales mention in S... John Rose
