On Wednesday, May 26, 2021, at 1:38 AM, Matt Mahoney wrote: > or example suppose your bit counters were (1, 1) = 0.5 and (1, 100) = 0.99. > Then with equal weights PAQ6 predicts (2, 101) = 0.98. Equal weights you say, but I don't believe giving ex. orders0-16 the same weight...some get ignored in the "judge court room"...do you mean something else?
I think because you only look at the last 5 letters (lol :p) that you are able to give the last 5 contexts the same weight, cuz they are all pretty sure, whereas orders 6 and up are immensely rare contexts. Right? Maybe a batch (pattern mechanism) would help, orders0-5 get the same weight, orders6-8 get same own weight, and so on. ? This would also allow parallization I think too, not just less % calculations. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T4ae6b3d15d72b22e-M12c0d320343a444585de0635 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
