On 7/7/21, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > "If you don't use deep learning (in AGI) you're missing out on the most > powerful > machine learning technique currently known." > > Aren't Transformers better than Deep Learning? OpenAI.com shows me that it > is.... What more could you want?
I mean Deep Learning as a broad term. > "1) learn from a massive amount of data, AND > 2) accomplish the learning task quickly." > > Mine can learn from massive data, my only problem to get a score of 15MB on > the Hutter Prize is performance in the way, I know how to get 15MB. I am > working on the performance implementation currently. You don't understand what I mean when I say: "gradient descent in deep learning is more efficient than combinatorial algorithms". The "deep" in deep learning refers to number of layers, and there is something special about that as well. If your AGI does not make use of deep learning, then you don't have an efficient learning algorithm, unless you have discovered another major breakthrough in machine learning. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tb5526c8a9151713b-M95f7a6f5bfd63aa0e3086380 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
