Totally ambiguous what you said, it could mean so many things.....can you clarify?
I've traced the problem back to the root, issue: shared += (longercounts[ii] * ((shortercounts[i] * normcreator) / longercounts[ii])) The leaped list has like 10 items and a few that have 8 or 9, so 25 counts total or so........the ice list has like 500, and many item types. At the bottom of my code, it norms correctly the 9 count for ex. 'into' or so it was for leaped, i.e. 500/25=20, so 9*20= ~200 because leaped's list is so tiny and is inflated, it's 'into' has a loto countos, so then I compare ice's 'into' which is about 27, except it isn't vice versa adjustive! So it does 200/27= ~9, then 27 * 9 = ~260....it is supposed to say hey 200<>27, we get (remember each set is 500 counts now) about 27 points here (up to a 500 count match, perfection). ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T01fa5e447808d368-M9f23b100788da8d208df858b Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
