While performing thought experiments on an AGI model I realized that there is no purely lossless compression. Something is always lost. For most practical purposes yes lossless exists. This might sound trivially obvious and non-obvious but it does impact the theory in the model.
In other words, I could not imagine any purely lossless compression, it might physically exist I just can't imagine it as I'm not a physicist. So maybe it does exist? or perhaps we just prefer it to be so... I suppose it's the same as saying true and false don't purely exist as crisp booleans. And, exists doesn’t purely exist…so everything is relative. But the implications are enormous when dealing with chaotic and complex systems models. Thus it being trivially obvious and trivially non-obvious or, non-trivially non-obvious... or... Net effect? Zero. Oh wait zero doesn't fully exist now does it. WTH? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwZwkk7q25I ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5ff6237e11d945fb-Mce05fa9f1ab04ee9cd87e46f Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
