I think we're talking about 2 different kinds of referencing. I was talking about a "References" section in the back of the book as an academic requirement to acknowledge citing and quotations within the body of work. Unless you do not consider systems architecture and AGI as 'Systems Science/, in which case I'd stand corrected. My only point was that it was a pity it wasn't there, because it would've indicated how the author's scientific thinking had directly progressed.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > Why waste time referencing hundreds of different algorithms or famous > phrases when you can write at ease and focus on the only architecture you > need? You can simply say "word2vec" without mentioning anything further. > Prove me wrong, I do listen. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tbd7dd87696a14378-M55a1c7a49bd17b9a843210b2> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tbd7dd87696a14378-M07eab5153c57cdb02fbc9865 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
