So, the monkey has either a longer lasting image to look around on manually, or more probably its context is better stored for IMAGE data and [maybe] worse for video data.
Sort of like it predicts the next video frame to be a finger moving to a number, number 2 now, and it looks at the START image of numbers and so it predicts the finger moving to that location.....tada....so it requires some precision, some reliability, some accuracy, and not some wacked up sparse messup maybe we have, or benefitted from. However, maybe that recency priming needs to be upped, cuz if its too far back then maybe it is just not "seeing it". ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T0c1f7e25feb03b01-M3581efc5a04af6102bd58b6d Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
