On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 3:51 PM Quan Tesla <[email protected]> wrote:
> EM has been around for many years. It's not the source of consciousness, > just a symbol of brain activity. Neuroscience have been observing patterns > and drawn conclusions from it, not proven the brain was conscious of its > own existence and cognitively attuned to itself. Sadly, this article has to > be challenged by opening a can of worms: "Define biological consciousness." > The article has been thoroughly and painfully peer reviewed by professional practitioners with the relevant knowledge. Everything in it is based on empirically proven facts from neuroscience and from fundamental physics. If you can deliver some empirically originated facts (with references from neuroscience and physics) that relate to questioning specific aspects of the article's message, Peter and I would welcome it and be able to comment. regards, Colin ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T9e4e609a498b77c4-Me1f801f02c18e7b894475d3c Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
