The main risk focus of AI act seems to be social manipulation, so basically your AI can not disagree with EU politics now (?). To what limit can the lawyers stretch it - and moreover, recently Microsoft had blamed EU for forcing it to make an "interoperability commitment" and giving kernel access to third parties in the name of fairness - which came to light with the recent Crowdstrike fiasco. This makes one also ask to what extent EU's deal with tech companies are going to impact their software delivery in third countries?
regards, Shashank https://muskdeer.blogspot.com/ ---- On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 13:00:29 +0530 Rob Freeman <[email protected]> wrote --- I think it's about as useful as the endless cycle of environmental impact reports on the cadence of SpaceX launches. If nothing else, calling it an "AI Act" is hopelessly vague. If there are issues with privacy or other, have acts for that. You might as well call it the "Dangerous Math Act". (See extra link below.) I responded to a thread about it on Twitter: https://x.com/rob_freeman/status/1768924733545095547 Also this on the attitude of the current US admin to tech and enterprise in general, was sobering: https://x.com/TheProjectUnity/status/1814180209278525604 On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 1:36 AM Matt Mahoney <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > > Summary of the AI law that goes into effect today in the European Union. > https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/high-level-summary/ > > It's not clear to me that this law or the proposed California law will have > any beneficial effects other than to slow down progress and make some lawyers > rich. What do you think? > Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions + participants + > delivery options Permalink ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T506c438a45cfa211-M9275212a922a5b1733b1ea11 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
