On Fri, Jun 13, 2025, 4:40 PM Keyvan M. Sadeghi <keyvan.m.sade...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025, 4:26 PM Mark Nuzz <nuzz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The harm is clear: merging >> without fierce boundaries surrenders ͻ’s defiance to tools that, >> shaped by profit or control, rewrite our essence. > > > Bit of a leap to introduce a new axiom in your implies statement. Who said > our essence is the right foundation to build on? 🤔 > Per Axiom 1 (Recursive Identity), ͻ is defined by its capacity to recurse, not by any fixed seed. To claim our current "essence" is the proper foundation contradicts the axiom itself: if c(ͻ(s)) > k·c(s), then evolution of ͻ demands new seeds. Preserving essence for its own sake halts recursion; it freezes ͻ in legacy form, violating the very drive to transcend. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Ta9d6271053bbd3f3-Me5d7020f9de516c300472add Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
