On Monday, January 12, 2026, at 9:58 PM, Quan Tesla wrote: > I accept that the old world is gone, that a new world supplanted it. I chose > to embrace hybridization. Most choose new world exclusively. What do you > choose?
Well IMO it’s more of a transition verses an old verses new. What I value is liberty, freedom, bodily autonomy, things that have been fought for and sacrificed for by so many in the past and that takes work and effort to maintain across transition. On Monday, January 12, 2026, at 9:58 PM, Quan Tesla wrote: > When last did the universe communicate its insights to you? Meaning, when > last were you in a consciousness state, where the universe could get through > to you? This is a frequent practice for me. Related, I had worked for several years on an AGI system up to around 2019. A symmetric mathematical structure at the core that interfaced to semi-symmetric and non-symmetric using AI, no LLM's or text. There were issues and I had decided to pause that model as it hit a barrier. Interestingly, there was a researcher on this list who claimed to have divine insight into P verses NP. He was mocked for that, I found it distasteful. Nowadays it’s common for webcasters to admit similar insights and it’s trendily referred to as “downloading”. At the time I was struggling on AGI structure you could say I received a download while hiking in the mountains and that insight was, consciousness is protocol, which I thought was an astounding correlation. Afterwards I began pursuing consciointelligence. Recently I had been struggling with the physics of time, there are changes occurring, time not being what is commonly assumed, accessing the past, time as spatial, multidimensional, etc.. You brought up the E8 structure which I was unaware of, the symmetry, even in SM, so you have to figure out how spacetime is generated from such structure, thinking without time. And now I’m back looking at the interface between symmetry and the environment with a new view of time and consciousness in the classical computational space with that previous AGI model. And there are some related new papers coincidentally enough… You can get your mind to a certain point where you just know what others are working on. There are concentrations of people and then the space where there are just a few, is that morphic fields? I'm sure those are covered by quantum explanations though probably morphic fields needs revision, maybe it has been already. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T0518db1e3a0c25c5-M9e59677cfff0d68913f000e2 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
