On Sat, Sep 26, 2026 at 1:25 AM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Bernie Sanders introduced a bill to permanently ban artificial super 
> intelligence, defined as
> "a system that exceeds human cognitive ability or has sufficient capabilities 
> to plan and
>  execute the destruction or disempowerment of humanity".

An entity already exists that "has sufficient capabilities to plan and
execute the destruction or disempowerment of humanity". It's called
humanity.

The only solution to that danger, is not a permanent ban on computer
technology. But a permanent ban on any form of new scientific
discovery, period. Which by its nature can have unknown consequences.
Research into health can be used to kill. Research into energy, the
bomb. Who can say but that research into black holes might not create
one, and swallow us all up.

Knowledge is just too dangerous in the hands of unchained primates.

Our only safety lies in permanent control by an oppressive central
authority which will punish all curiosity. Endless stasis. Or even
regression to an agricultural state. One in which our current energy
technology does not slowly kill us through global warming. Or our
current biological technology through viruses. Or chemistry consume us
all in an encroaching "grey goo", runaway chemical reaction.

Or we can seek greater intelligence to anticipate dangers. Safety in
variety. For each example of malice a counter example of benevolence.
Anticipating and counteracting. Fighting fire with fire. As has been
our only defense against species extinction from our existing state of
power over our environment, for some years now.

Computers are a lot safer than humans in control of ever more powerful
technology. Because humans have malice. Up to us if we are stupid
enough to program malice into computers. There's no reason why they
should develop it on their own. Unless perhaps we give them a survival
imperative. But things like a survival imperative are very
idiosyncratic to humans. Who are the main risk. The main risk of
computers is their continuing stupidity. The paper clip maximizer.
Good intent, with unexpected bad consequences. And the best defense
against that is a variety of computers, identifying unexpected
consequences as they occur, and mitigating both the accidental harms
of computer stupidity, and whatever unexpected consequences humans
manage to mess up on our own.

-Rob

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8d5b2f4ea82b5542-M26af9fe2a811ca308b7c7ac0
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to