Ben:I don't think that often in terms of sentences like you do; and nor do I think that often in terms of visual images like Mike Tintner does...
I tend to think more in non-dimensional / higher-dimensional abstract topological forms, it seems... I think we all have a great diversity of unconscious reasoning mechanisms, and for various reasons we, as individuals, habitually focus on different ones in the teeny portion of our brain concerned with intensely-conscious, deliberative thinking... Ben, Well, the general Minsky line of "a brain needs a whole kludgeful of approaches.." I v. much approve. However, just an off the cuff thought - I suspect they are all fundamentally "linear" - not in the current sci. sequential sense, but simply in the sense of "of lines". You'll note your geometric and spatial approaches are fundamentally linear. My fluid schematic outlines (cog embodied sci's too to a great extent) are obviously so. And so actually, fundamentally is the sentential/propositional foundation of language, logic and maths - though that needs some explanation, wh. I won't try now. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
