Steve,

 

Any thoughts? Tons of them! Can't even organize them properly. Steve, you
don't know what you have found, correction you know very well what you have
found, you are one of the very very few people who really understand how
self-organization works. When I started reading I first thought of reminding
you that emergent structures, for example in the brain are very sensitive to
the information that the brain is receiving (butterfly effect), which is a
theoretival prediction, but you not only know that from observation but you
are even using it for practical purposes. And successfull purposes. Have you
or are you planning to publish something on this? 

 

Your thoughts are oriented to aging, and rigthfully so. But in vision alone
there are so many applications. You are basically saying that corrective
lenses in some cases may worsen the problem. You are probably not the first
to propose a natural way for correcting vision problems. A few years ago I
had an hemorrage in one of my retinas. It healed, but it left a dark spot in
my field of vision. The eye doctor shook me to the bones when he said "don't
worry, your brain will find its way around it." It did. The spot is still
there - I can find it by focusing my attention - but I don't notice it at
all. But this is passive. You suggest to actively engage the brain and make
it to do what needs to be done. You may be the first in that. 

 

Maybe you can correct stereoscopic problems in peripheral vision. As I age,
changes in my eyes have affected my ability to perceive the correct position
of objects I am not looking at. My cup of tea is on the table and when I try
to grab the sugar farther away I hit the cup and the tea goes airborne. 

 

You are also saying that neurons, even in old age, possess the same ability
to self-organize they had when we were babies. Remarkable. I take that as a
confirmation of my EI theory. 

 

Sergio

 

From: Steve Richfield [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 1:08 PM
To: AGI
Subject: [agi] Lessons for AGI from the first glaucoma reversal

 

I have just performed apparently the first ever reversal of a glaucoma blind
spot. Aside from the medical implications, there is "crossover" to AGI,
uploading/downloading, and other non-medical areas of interest.

The fundamental problem in glaucoma appears to be hyper-development - that
things self-organize to approximately what we expect - and then keep right
on developing to the point of self-destruction. As I look around, there are
other areas of aging that could easily be explained in terms of
hyper-development. It is unclear to me whether hyper-development is some
sort of impassible barrier, or just some more "programming" is needed for
the next phases of our lives.

What apparently happened in my own eyes is that they first developed
normally. However, my right eye had slightly sharper vision due to an
"insignificant" flaw in the lens of my left eye, so my right eye eventually
"took over" detail vision, leaving my left eye to "take over" most of the
peripheral vision, at least the part that was visible to my left eye. While
even now with a cataract my left eye still has 20-30 vision, I could barely
read with it. My right eye had become blind to the left, because that part
of the field was being "handled" by my left eye. The only barely noticeable
effect of all this was that when examining fine details, I often habitually
closed my left eye. In short, this hyper-development was working GREAT and
probably improved my overall vision - except for one "little" detail:

With part of the peripheral field being abandoned in my right eye, my
right-side optic nerve was shrinking, and the circulation within my right
eye was diminishing because there was little need to feed neurons that
weren't doing anything. Eventually, the pressure in my right eye could have
pushed the shrinking optic nerve out through the hole it now passes through,
destroying its connections to the retina, and I could have gone completely
blind in my right eye.

The "fix" was simple. For a while each day, I wore special glasses that
impaired my vision in ways that forced a return to more normal operation.
These glasses slightly blurred my right eye, forcing my left eye to see any
fine details, and they impaired the peripheral vision in my left eye,
forcing my right eye to turn those idle neurons back on in order to see to
the left. Masking tape on the left lens was adjusted until success was
achieved.

As hoped for, the thickness of my right retina has been increasing, now
having gained ~4 microns on average. It still needs to gain another ~19
microns to match my healthier left eye. This gain is believed to be mostly
in additional circulation.

Other apparent areas of hyper-development come in gradually trading memories
for understanding - until there are few if any memories left in the very
old. Our skin keeps on developing wrinkles as needed to relieve stresses.
Even our noses just keep on growing, a little like Pinocchio's.

Living forever would seem to not only involve limitless mental resources,
but also some triage to eliminate parts that are no longer worth their
overhead - by some presently unknown measure. Complexity incurs propagation
losses, miss-identification errors, reliance on obsolete dependencies, etc.

I have been researching aging-related problems for myself and other
cooperative "victims", and have found that things like destructive habits,
superstitious learning in our central metabolic control systems, and
hyper-development are what actually disables and kills older people, at
least the people I know, and not the shopping list of things for which
Aubrey de Grey is now calling for research. Note that these are "soft"
problems in that they are easily correctable without "magic potions". It
appears that decades of additional lifespan may be available via these
"soft" methods.

Aubrey's list may yet become a guiding light, but not before these other
problems are tackled, as the vast majority of people are now being disabled
and killed for some really easy to fix reasons that are NOT on Aubrey's
present list.

Any thoughts?

Steve


AGI |  <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> Archives
<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/18883996-f0d58d57> |
<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
ad2> Modify Your Subscription

 <http://www.listbox.com> 

 




-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to